. IQF
œTechnical
Comparison Data

‘
Technical comparison between IMPINGEMENT and other tunnel freezer

-
IMPINGEMENT
Tunnel Freezer
Other
Tunnel Freezer
Freezing Method
IMPINGEMENT Method–‚P
Airflow spreads unevenly
Freezing Time
‚P^‚S`‚Q^‚S@@@@@–‚Q(as quick as cryogenic freezing system.)
‚P
Installation Space
‚P^‚Q`‚Q^‚R@@@@@–‚R
‚P
Expandability
Easy to expand for future growth due to its modular construction. –
Another tunnel has to be installed independently to expand.
Evaporator Defrost Method
On-line evaporator defrost can keep production line running during defrost and it only takes as quick as 6 minutes.
Production line has to be stopped during defrost.
Versatility
Three-level conveyor system allows optimum production flexibility. It can be configured to freeze different products independently. (Multiple Conveyor Systems Π Cascade and independent)–
One product to freeze in one tunnel.
Belt Type
Numerous belt types are available to go with product.
One belt type is available for most tunnel.
Other
E USDA approved
E Easy to clean inside
E All stainless steel enclosure for optimum durability
E Hard to clean inside.

– FUnique to Impingement Tunnel Freezer
– FOur own research
– FBLC is patented to Ross Industries, Inc.